Celeron N6211 vs Xeon Platinum 8175M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8175M
24 cores / 48 threads
15.11
+1090%

Xeon Platinum 8175M outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 1090% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5252495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumElkhart Lake
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release dateno data17 July 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads482
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.5 MBno data
L2 cache24 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache33 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketSocket PBGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)no data1.5 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size1,536 GB tdp=240 Wattno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 15.11
+1090%
Celeron N6211 1.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 26659
+1087%
Samples: 2
Celeron N6211 2245
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.11 1.27
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Xeon Platinum 8175M has a 1089.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8175M is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
Xeon Platinum 8175M
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8175M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 5 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Platinum 8175M and Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.