Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon Platinum 8173M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8173M
28 cores / 56 threads
17.98
+57.9%
Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.39

Xeon Platinum 8173M outperforms Ryzen 5 3600 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8173M and Ryzen 5 3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking347691
Place by popularitynot in top-1009
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.36
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiencyno data16.28
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Ryzen 5 3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads5612
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.75 MB384 KB
L2 cache28 MB3 MB
L3 cache38.5 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8173M and Ryzen 5 3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket PAM4
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Ryzen 5 3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Ryzen 5 3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Ryzen 5 3600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Ryzen 5 3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size1,536 GB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Ryzen 5 3600.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 17.98
+57.9%
Ryzen 5 3600 11.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 28025
+57.9%
Ryzen 5 3600 17748

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.98 11.39
Physical cores 28 6
Threads 56 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

Xeon Platinum 8173M has a 57.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 366.7% more physical cores and 366.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 3600, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8173M is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8173M is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8173M and Ryzen 5 3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M
Xeon Platinum 8173M
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 8 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8173M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 17155 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8173M or Ryzen 5 3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.