EPYC 7313 vs Xeon Platinum 8173M

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	246	175
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.77	16.41
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Xeon Platinum	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Skylake (server) (2017−2019)	Milan (2021)
Release date	no data	12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,083
Current price	$1999	$1412 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7313 has 2031% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8173M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	28 (Octacosa-Core)	16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads	56	32
Base clock speed	no data	3 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.1 GHz	3.7 GHz
L1 cache	1.75 MB	1 MB
L2 cache	28 MB	8 MB
L3 cache	38.5 MB	128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm+
Die size	no data	4x 81 mm2
Number of transistors	no data	16,600 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	8 (Multiprocessor)	2
Socket	Socket P	SP3
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
TSX	+	no data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

+

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2666	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	1,536 GB	4 TiB
Max memory channels	6	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	128.001 GB/s	204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313.

PCIe version	3.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	48	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7313 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8173M by 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	20.58	25.27
Physical cores	28	16
Threads	56	32
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---