EPYC 7713 vs Xeon Platinum 8168

Place in the ranking	253	28
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.88	4.00
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Xeon Platinum	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Milan (2021−2023)
Release date	25 April 2017 (7 years ago)	15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,890	$7,060

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7713 has 3% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8168.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8168 and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	24 (Tetracosa-Core)	64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads	48	128
Base clock speed	2.7 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.7 GHz	3.68 GHz
Multiplier	27	20
L1 cache	1.5 MB	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	24 MB	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	33 MB	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm+
Die size	no data	8x 81 mm²
Maximum core temperature	85 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	33,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8168 and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	8 (Multiprocessor)	2
Socket	FCLGA3647	SP3
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Speed Shift	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8168 and EPYC 7713 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2666	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	768 GB	4 TiB
Max memory channels	6	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	128.001 GB/s	204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8168 and EPYC 7713.

PCIe version	3.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	48	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8168 21.46

EPYC 7713 53.61
+150%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8168 33099

EPYC 7713 82666
+150%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Platinum 8168 1237

EPYC 7713 1579
+27.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Platinum 8168 10598

EPYC 7713 15297
+44.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.46	53.61
Recency	25 April 2017	15 March 2021
Physical cores	24	64
Threads	48	128
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	225 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8168 has 9.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7713, on the other hand, has a 149.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8168 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8168 and EPYC 7713, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.