EPYC 9555 vs Xeon Platinum 8163

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8163
24 cores / 48 threads
0.97
EPYC 9555
2024
64 cores / 128 threads, 360 Watt
83.17
+8474%

EPYC 9555 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8163 by a whopping 8474% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8163 and EPYC 9555 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25316
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.06
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiencyno data21.96
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Turin (2024)
Release dateno data10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,826

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8163 and EPYC 9555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads48128
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8163 and EPYC 9555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSocket PSP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8163 and EPYC 9555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8163 and EPYC 9555 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8163 and EPYC 9555 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8163 and EPYC 9555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8163 and EPYC 9555.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Platinum 8163 0.97
EPYC 9555 83.17
+8474%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8163 1561
EPYC 9555 133253
+8436%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 83.17
Physical cores 24 64
Threads 48 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm

EPYC 9555 has a 8474.2% higher aggregate performance score, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9555 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8163 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8163
Xeon Platinum 8163
AMD EPYC 9555
EPYC 9555

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8163 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 9555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Platinum 8163 and EPYC 9555, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.