Ultra 5 245KF vs Xeon Platinum 8160M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8160M
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
33.47
+20.9%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.68

Xeon Platinum 8160M outperforms Core Ultra 5 245KF by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core Ultra 5 245KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking117176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.1882.60
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency21.1220.96
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,704$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 5 245KF has 1237% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8160M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core Ultra 5 245KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Threads4814
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.2 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.5 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size1.5 TB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core Ultra 5 245KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8160M 33.47
+20.9%
Ultra 5 245KF 27.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8160M 53158
+20.9%
Ultra 5 245KF 43973

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.47 27.68
Recency 25 April 2017 24 October 2024
Physical cores 24 14
Threads 48 14
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8160M has a 20.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 71.4% more physical cores and 242.9% more threads.

Ultra 5 245KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8160M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 245KF in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8160M is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 245KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core Ultra 5 245KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8160M
Xeon Platinum 8160M
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 20 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8160M or Core Ultra 5 245KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.