Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Xeon Platinum 8160M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8160M
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
33.47
+19.6%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024
12 cores / 12 threads, 32 Watt
27.99

Xeon Platinum 8160M outperforms Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8160M and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking116167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.18no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumApple M4
Power efficiency21.1282.78
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)no data
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,704no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4812
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.592 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.51 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.5 MBno data
L2 cache24 MB4 MB
L3 cache33 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8160M and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M4 16-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores).

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.47 27.99
Recency 25 April 2017 30 October 2024
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 32 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8160M has a 19.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 368.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8160M is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8160M is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8160M and Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8160M
Xeon Platinum 8160M
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 20 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8160M or Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.