Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Platinum 8160

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8160
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
18.64
+143%

Platinum 8160 outperforms E5-2650 v3 by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon E5-2650 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking293895
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.561.36
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Haswell-EP (2014)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)8 September 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,702no data
Current price$900 (0.2x MSRP)$34

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8160 has 971% better value for money than Xeon E5-2650 v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon E5-2650 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads4820
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache1.5 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache33 MB25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data356 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C79 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon E5-2650 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon E5-2650 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon E5-2650 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon E5-2650 v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon E5-2650 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size768 GB768 GB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon E5-2650 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8160 18.64
+143%
Xeon E5-2650 v3 7.68

Platinum 8160 outperforms E5-2650 v3 by 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8160 28825
+143%
Xeon E5-2650 v3 11882

Platinum 8160 outperforms E5-2650 v3 by 143% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.64 7.68
Recency 25 April 2017 8 September 2014
Physical cores 24 10
Threads 48 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 105 Watt

The Xeon Platinum 8160 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2650 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon E5-2650 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8160
Xeon Platinum 8160
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
Xeon E5-2650 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 37 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1087 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8160 or Xeon E5-2650 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.