Xeon 6369P vs Platinum 8160
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6369P outperforms Xeon Platinum 8160 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 398 | 381 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.95 | 77.06 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | no data |
| Power efficiency | 11.53 | 18.74 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 25 April 2017 (8 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,702 | $606 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon 6369P has 2512% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8160.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon 6369P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 21 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 24 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 33 MB | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 85 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon 6369P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon 6369P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon 6369P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon 6369P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon 6369P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 128.001 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8160 and Xeon 6369P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.93 | 18.46 |
| Recency | 25 April 2017 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 8 |
| Threads | 48 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 95 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 8160 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Xeon 6369P, on the other hand, has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 57.9% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 and Intel Xeon 6369P.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
