EPYC 9745 vs Xeon Platinum 8124M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8124M
18 cores / 36 threads, 240 Watt
15.80
EPYC 9745
2024
128 cores / 256 threads, 400 Watt
94.08
+495%

EPYC 9745 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8124M by a whopping 495% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 9745 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.49
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency6.2722.40
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Turin (2024)
Release dateno data10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$12,141

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 9745 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)128
Threads36256
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1.125 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache18 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 9745 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSocket PSP5
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 9745. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 9745 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 9745 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 9745. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 9745.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Platinum 8124M 15.80
EPYC 9745 94.08
+495%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8124M 25350
EPYC 9745 150920
+495%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.80 94.08
Physical cores 18 128
Threads 36 256
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 400 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8124M has 66.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9745, on the other hand, has a 495.4% higher aggregate performance score, 611.1% more physical cores and 611.1% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 9745 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M
Xeon Platinum 8124M
AMD EPYC 9745
EPYC 9745

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 26 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8124M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9745 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 9745, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.