EPYC 9654 vs Xeon Phi 7295

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated6
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.29
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PhiAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data19.90
Architecture codenameKnights Mill (2017)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date18 December 2017 (6 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores72 (Doheptaconta-Core)96
Threads288192
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier1524
L1 cache4.5 MB6 MB
L2 cache36 MB96 MB
L3 cache0 KB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.550-1.2Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSVLCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size384 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Max video memory1 GBno data
Graphics max frequency0 MHzno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes36128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 December 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 72 96
Threads 288 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 360 Watt

Xeon Phi 7295 has 50% more threads, and 12.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 33.3% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 9654. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 7295
Xeon Phi 7295
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 14 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 992 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Phi 7295 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.