Ultra 9 285K vs Xeon Phi 7295

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Phi 7295 and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated51
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.74
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Phino data
Power efficiencyno data32.71
Architecture codenameKnights Mill (2017)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 December 2017 (6 years ago)24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 7295 and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores72 (Doheptaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads28824
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache32K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.550-1.2Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 7295 and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSVLCLGA36471851
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 7295 and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Max video memory1 GBno data
Graphics max frequency0 MHzno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes3620

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2017 24 October 2024
Physical cores 72 24
Threads 288 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Phi 7295 has 200% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 156% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7295 and Core Ultra 9 285K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Phi 7295 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7295 and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 7295
Xeon Phi 7295
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 14 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 101 vote

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Phi 7295 or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.