Ryzen 9 7950X vs Xeon Phi 7290
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon Phi 7290 by a whopping 231% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 704 | 77 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 4.61 | 21.98 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Knights Landing (2016) | Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 27 September 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 9 7950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 72 (Doheptaconta-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 288 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | CCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 47 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 13140 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 9 7950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 3647 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 245 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 9 7950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 9 7950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 9 7950X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 9 7950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5-5200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 9 7950X.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.80 | 39.01 |
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 27 September 2022 |
| Physical cores | 72 | 16 |
| Threads | 288 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 245 Watt | 170 Watt |
Xeon Phi 7290 has 350% more physical cores and 800% more threads.
Ryzen 9 7950X, on the other hand, has a 230.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 44.1% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Phi 7290 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7950X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
