Ryzen 7 4800U vs Xeon Phi 7290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Phi 7290
2016
72 cores / 288 threads, 245 Watt
10.15
+7.9%

Xeon Phi 7290 outperforms Ryzen 7 4800U by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking844897
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency1.7526.51
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameKnights Landing (2016)Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)
Release date20 June 2016 (9 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 7 4800U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores72 (Doheptaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28816
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data18
L1 cache32 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors8,000 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 7 4800U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket3647FP6
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 7 4800U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 7 4800U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 7 4800U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 7 4800U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 7 4800U.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Phi 7290 10.15
+7.9%
Ryzen 7 4800U 9.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Phi 7290 17839
+7.9%
Ryzen 7 4800U 16534

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.15 9.41
Recency 20 June 2016 6 January 2020
Physical cores 72 8
Threads 288 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon Phi 7290 has a 7.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads.

Ryzen 7 4800U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1533.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon Phi 7290 and AMD Ryzen 7 4800U.

Be aware that Xeon Phi 7290 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 4800U is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 7290
Xeon Phi 7290
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
Ryzen 7 4800U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 42 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 247 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4800U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Phi 7290 and Ryzen 7 4800U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.