EPYC 4464P vs Xeon Phi 7290
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4464P outperforms Xeon Phi 7290 by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 704 | 160 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 69.46 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 4.61 | 27.22 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Knights Landing (2016) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $399 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 72 (Doheptaconta-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 288 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 13,140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 3647 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 245 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.80 | 29.84 |
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 21 May 2024 |
| Physical cores | 72 | 12 |
| Threads | 288 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 245 Watt | 105 Watt |
Xeon Phi 7290 has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
EPYC 4464P, on the other hand, has a 152.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
