EPYC 4464P vs Xeon Phi 7290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Phi 7290
2016
72 cores / 288 threads, 245 Watt
11.80
EPYC 4464P
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
29.84
+153%

EPYC 4464P outperforms Xeon Phi 7290 by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking697158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.46
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.6127.19
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameKnights Landing (2016)Raphael (2023−2025)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores72 (Doheptaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads28824
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache32 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors8,000 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket3647AM5
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Phi 7290 11.80
EPYC 4464P 29.84
+153%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Phi 7290 18926
EPYC 4464P 47873
+153%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.80 29.84
Recency 20 June 2016 21 May 2024
Physical cores 72 12
Threads 288 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon Phi 7290 has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

EPYC 4464P, on the other hand, has a 152.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 7290
Xeon Phi 7290
AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 41 vote

Rate Xeon Phi 7290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 25 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 4464P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.