EPYC 9655P vs Xeon Phi 7235

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Phi 7235 and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.62
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Phino data
Power efficiencyno data23.66
Architecture codenameKnights Mill (2017)Turin (2024)
Release date1 December 2017 (7 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 7235 and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)96
Threads256192
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz4.5 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache32K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data12x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.550-1.2Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 7235 and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSVLCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7235 and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 7235 and EPYC 9655P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7235 and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7235 and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR5
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.381 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7235 and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes36128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2017 10 October 2024
Physical cores 64 96
Threads 256 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 400 Watt

Xeon Phi 7235 has 33.3% more threads, and 60% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 50% more physical cores, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7235 and EPYC 9655P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7235 and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 7235
Xeon Phi 7235
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5
2 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5
255 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Phi 7235 or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.