EPYC Embedded 3401 vs Xeon Phi 7230F
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Knights Landing (2016) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 7230F and EPYC Embedded 3401 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 256 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.85 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 18.5 |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | 1536 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 7230F and EPYC Embedded 3401 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 3647 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7230F and EPYC Embedded 3401. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 7230F and EPYC Embedded 3401 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7230F and EPYC Embedded 3401 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7230F and EPYC Embedded 3401. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 16 |
| Threads | 256 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 85 Watt |
Xeon Phi 7230F has 300% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.
EPYC Embedded 3401, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 170.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon Phi 7230F and AMD EPYC Embedded 3401. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
