Ultra X7 368H vs Xeon Phi 7230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiencyno data31.22
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameKnights Landing (2016)Panther Lake (2026)
Release date20 June 2016 (9 years ago)5 January 2026 (recently)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 7230 and Core Ultra X7 368H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Efficient-coresno data8
Low Power Efficient-coresno data4
Threads25616
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache32 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 7230 and Core Ultra X7 368H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket3647FCBGA2540
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and Core Ultra X7 368H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 7230 and Core Ultra X7 368H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and Core Ultra X7 368H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and Core Ultra X7 368H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4LPDDR5X-9600
Maximum memory sizeno data96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Arc™ B390 GPU
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.5 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon Phi 7230 and Core Ultra X7 368H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and Core Ultra X7 368H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over eDPno data3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and Core Ultra X7 368H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX 12 Ultimate
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and Core Ultra X7 368H.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 5 January 2026
Physical cores 64 16
Threads 256 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 25 Watt

Xeon Phi 7230 has 300% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Ultra X7 368H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 760% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon Phi 7230 and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Phi 7230 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra X7 368H is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 7230
Xeon Phi 7230
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
Core Ultra X7 368H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Phi 7230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra X7 368H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Phi 7230 and Core Ultra X7 368H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.