Xeon 6532P-B vs Phi 7210
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1489 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.82 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Knights Landing (2016) | no data |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) | 1 July 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 7210 and Xeon 6532P-B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 32 |
| Threads | 256 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 0 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 7210 and Xeon 6532P-B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 3647 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 215 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7210 and Xeon 6532P-B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 7210 and Xeon 6532P-B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7210 and Xeon 6532P-B are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7210 and Xeon 6532P-B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.13 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7210 and Xeon 6532P-B.
| PCIe version | no data | Gen 4, Gen 5 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 1 July 2025 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 32 |
| Threads | 256 | 64 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 215 Watt | 205 Watt |
Xeon Phi 7210 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Xeon 6532P-B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and 4.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon Phi 7210 and Intel Xeon 6532P-B. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
