Itanium 9340 vs Xeon Phi 31S1P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Knights Corner (2012−2014) | no data |
| Release date | 17 June 2013 (12 years ago) | 1 January 2010 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 31S1P and Itanium 9340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 57 (Heptapentaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 228 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 20 MB L3 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 350 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 31S1P and Itanium 9340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PCIe x16 | FCLGA1248 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 185 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 31S1P and Itanium 9340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 50 Bit |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 31S1P and Itanium 9340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 31S1P and Itanium 9340 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 31S1P and Itanium 9340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 June 2013 | 1 January 2010 |
| Physical cores | 57 | 4 |
| Threads | 228 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 185 Watt |
Xeon Phi 31S1P has an age advantage of 3 years, 1325% more physical cores and 2750% more threads, and a 195% more advanced lithography process.
Itanium 9340, on the other hand, has 46% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon Phi 31S1P and Intel Itanium 9340. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
