Ultra 9 285K vs Xeon Phi 3120A

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Phi 3120A and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated50
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.90
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data32.79
Architecture codenameKnights Corner (2012−2014)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date17 June 2013 (11 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 3120A and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores57 (Heptapentaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads22824
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
L1 cache32 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Die size350 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors5,000 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 3120A and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPCIe x161851
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 3120A and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 3120A and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 3120A and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 3120A and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 3120A and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 June 2013 24 October 2024
Physical cores 57 24
Threads 228 24
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Phi 3120A has 137.5% more physical cores and 850% more threads.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 633.3% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 3120A and Core Ultra 9 285K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Phi 3120A is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 3120A and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 3120A
Xeon Phi 3120A
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Phi 3120A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 111 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Phi 3120A or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.