Ryzen AI Embedded P164 vs Xeon Max 9460
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) | Gorgon Point (2026) |
| Release date | 10 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 9 March 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $8,750 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Max 9460 and Ryzen AI Embedded P164 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 40 (Tetraconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 80 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 97.5 MB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 4x 477 mm2 | 233 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 77 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Max 9460 and Ryzen AI Embedded P164 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 4677 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Max 9460 and Ryzen AI Embedded P164. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Max 9460 and Ryzen AI Embedded P164 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Max 9460 and Ryzen AI Embedded P164 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Max 9460 and Ryzen AI Embedded P164. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 880M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Max 9460 and Ryzen AI Embedded P164.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 80 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 January 2023 | 9 March 2026 |
| Physical cores | 40 | 8 |
| Threads | 80 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 28 Watt |
Xeon Max 9460 has 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads.
Ryzen AI Embedded P164, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon Max 9460 and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Max 9460 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
