Xeon Platinum 8360H vs MP 7030 Dual-Core
Primary details
Comparing Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Platinum 8360H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | Paxville (2002−2005) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | December 2005 (18 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Platinum 8360H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 33 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Platinum 8360H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 8 |
| Socket | 604 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Platinum 8360H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Platinum 8360H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Platinum 8360H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Platinum 8360H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.12 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Platinum 8360H.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 225 Watt |
Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core has 66.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8360H, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Platinum 8360H. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Platinum 8360H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
