Apple M1 vs Xeon MP 3.33

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
DesignerIntelApple
Architecture codenamePotomac (2005)no data
Release dateMarch 2005 (20 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon MP 3.33 and M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache16 KB2 MB
L2 cache1 MB16 MB
L3 cache8 MB16 MB
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)73 °Cno data
Number of transistors286 million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon MP 3.33 and M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket604no data
Power consumption (TDP)135 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 3.33 and M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon MP 3.33 and Apple M1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon MP 3.33 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon MP 3.33
Xeon MP 3.33
Apple M1
M1

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon MP 3.33 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2392 votes

Rate M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon MP 3.33 and M1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.