Xeon Phi 7255 vs MP 3.16
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Potomac (2005) | no data |
| Release date | March 2005 (20 years ago) | 1 October 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon MP 3.16 and Xeon Phi 7255 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 68 (Octahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 68 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.17 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 34 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 82 °C |
| Number of transistors | 286 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.550-1.2V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon MP 3.16 and Xeon Phi 7255 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 604 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 215 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 3.16 and Xeon Phi 7255. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon MP 3.16 and Xeon Phi 7255 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon MP 3.16 and Xeon Phi 7255 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon MP 3.16 and Xeon Phi 7255. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 384 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 115.2 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon MP 3.16 and Xeon Phi 7255.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 36 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 68 |
| Threads | 1 | 68 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 215 Watt |
Xeon MP 3.16 has 59.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7255, on the other hand, has 6700% more physical cores and 6700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon MP 3.16 and Intel Xeon Phi 7255. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
