EPYC 9274F vs Xeon L7445
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 85 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 13.74 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 5.57 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Dunnington (2008) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 15 September 2008 (17 years ago) | 10 November 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,980 | $3,060 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Xeon L7445 and EPYC 9274F: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 4.05 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.13 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 40.5 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (per module) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 503 mm2 | 8x 72 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 64 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,900 million | 52,560 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 0.9V-1.45V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L7445 and EPYC 9274F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 2 |
| Socket | PGA604 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 320 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L7445 and EPYC 9274F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon L7445 and EPYC 9274F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L7445 and EPYC 9274F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L7445 and EPYC 9274F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L7445 and EPYC 9274F.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 September 2008 | 10 November 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 24 |
| Threads | 4 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 320 Watt |
Xeon L7445 has 540% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9274F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon L7445 and AMD EPYC 9274F. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
