i5-2310 vs Xeon L5639

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5639
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
2.78
+20.9%
Core i5-2310
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.30

Xeon L5639 outperforms Core i5-2310 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5639 and Core i5-2310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16921809
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.43
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.362.28
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)22 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$150

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5639 and Core i5-2310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.133 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2216 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °C73 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1,160 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5639 and Core i5-2310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket1366LGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5639 and Core i5-2310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon L5639 and Core i5-2310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5639 and Core i5-2310 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5639 and Core i5-2310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel HD Graphics 2000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon L5639 and Core i5-2310 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5639 and Core i5-2310.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5639 2.78
+20.9%
i5-2310 2.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5639 4419
+20.7%
i5-2310 3660

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.78 2.30
Recency 14 February 2011 22 May 2011
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon L5639 has a 20.9% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 58.3% lower power consumption.

i5-2310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

The Xeon L5639 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-2310 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5639 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-2310 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5639 and Core i5-2310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5639
Xeon L5639
Intel Core i5-2310
Core i5-2310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L5639 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 579 votes

Rate Core i5-2310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5639 or Core i5-2310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.