A10-8700P vs Xeon L5639

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5639
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
2.52
+96.9%

Xeon L5639 outperforms A10-8700P by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19972533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Carrizo
Power efficiency1.773.60
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date14 February 2011 (15 years ago)3 June 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon L5639 and A10-8700P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.133 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5639 and A10-8700P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
Socket1366FP4
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5639 and A10-8700P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX-AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Xeon L5639 and A10-8700P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5639 and A10-8700P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5639 and A10-8700P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon L5639 and A10-8700P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon L5639 and A10-8700P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5639 and A10-8700P.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon L5639 2.52
+96.9%
A10-8700P 1.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon L5639 4419
+96.6%
Samples: 16
A10-8700P 2248
Samples: 846

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.52 1.28
Recency 14 February 2011 3 June 2015
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon L5639 has a 97% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

A10-8700P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon L5639 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10-8700P in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5639 is a server/workstation processor while A10-8700P is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L5639 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 141 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon L5639 and A10-8700P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.