EPYC 9454 vs Xeon L5630
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9454 outperforms Xeon L5630 by a whopping 2789% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2279 | 55 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | 7.81 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 1.84 | 7.31 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 16 March 2010 (16 years ago) | 10 November 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,100 | $5,225 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 9454 has 19425% better value for money than Xeon L5630.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon L5630 and EPYC 9454 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.75 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 27.5 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | 8x 72 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 63 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 52,560 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L5630 and EPYC 9454 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 290 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5630 and EPYC 9454. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon L5630 and EPYC 9454 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5630 and EPYC 9454 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5630 and EPYC 9454. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | 288 GB | 6 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5630 and EPYC 9454.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.74 | 50.26 |
| Recency | 16 March 2010 | 10 November 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 48 |
| Threads | 8 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 290 Watt |
Xeon L5630 has 625% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9454, on the other hand, has a 2789% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 9454 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon L5630 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
