Core 2 Quad Q9650 vs Xeon L5609

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5609
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 40 Watt
2.16
+33.3%

Xeon L5609 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9650 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Quad Q9650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18812103
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.921.55
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Quad Q9650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz3 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)6 MB (per die)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum core temperature63 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million820 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Quad Q9650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Quad Q9650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE40 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Quad Q9650 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Quad Q9650 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Quad Q9650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Quad Q9650.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5609 2.16
+33.3%
Core 2 Quad Q9650 1.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5609 3298
+33.3%
Core 2 Quad Q9650 2475

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.16 1.62
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon L5609 has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 137.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon L5609 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5609 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q9650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Quad Q9650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5609
Xeon L5609
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Core 2 Quad Q9650

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L5609 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1603 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5609 or Core 2 Quad Q9650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.