EPYC 9845 vs Xeon L5508

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5508 and EPYC 9845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameGainestown (2009−2010)Turin (2024)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$13,564

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5508 and EPYC 9845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)160
Threads4320
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5508 and EPYC 9845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
Socket1366SP5
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5508 and EPYC 9845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon L5508 and EPYC 9845 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5508 and EPYC 9845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5508 and EPYC 9845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5508 and EPYC 9845.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2009 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 160
Threads 4 320
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 390 Watt

Xeon L5508 has 926.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9845, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 7900% more physical cores and 7900% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon L5508 and EPYC 9845. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5508 and EPYC 9845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5508
Xeon L5508
AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L5508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5508 or EPYC 9845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.