Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Xeon L5410

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5410
2008
50 Watt
1.22
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
14.48
+1087%

Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Xeon L5410 by a whopping 1087% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5410 and Ryzen 5 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2318491
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency2.3139.15
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5410 and Ryzen 5 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed2.33 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5410 and Ryzen 5 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771FP8
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5410 and Ryzen 5 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon L5410 and Ryzen 5 7640HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5410 and Ryzen 5 7640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5410 and Ryzen 5 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5410 and Ryzen 5 7640HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5410 1.22
Ryzen 5 7640HS 14.48
+1087%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5410 1940
Ryzen 5 7640HS 23006
+1086%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 14.48
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 7640HS has a 1086.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5410 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5410 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7640HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5410 and Ryzen 5 7640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5410
Xeon L5410
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 67 votes

Rate Xeon L5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 480 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5410 or Ryzen 5 7640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.