Athlon 64 FX-62 vs Xeon L5410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5410
2008, $320
4 cores / 4 threads, 50 Watt
1.05
+87.5%

Xeon L5410 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-62 by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26543078
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAthlon 64 (Desktop)
Power efficiency2.25no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameHarpertown (2007−2008)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date25 March 2008 (17 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$320no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5410 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.33 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rateno data1000 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache6 MB (per die)1 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2220 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)76 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 million243 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5410 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketLGA771AM2
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt2 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5410 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon L5410 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5410 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5410 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5410 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon L5410 1.05
+87.5%
Athlon 64 FX-62 0.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon L5410 1853
+86.6%
Samples: 37
Athlon 64 FX-62 993
Samples: 22

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.05 0.56
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon L5410 has a 87.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 FX-62, on the other hand, has 2400% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon L5410 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5410 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 FX-62 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5410
Xeon L5410
AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
Athlon 64 FX-62

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 69 votes

Rate Xeon L5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon L5410 and Athlon 64 FX-62, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.