Xeon Silver 4416+ vs L5335
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Silver 4416+ outperforms Xeon L5335 by a whopping 2437% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2634 | 235 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | 21.16 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.84 | 6.43 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Clovertown (2006−2007) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 13 August 2007 (18 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $380 | $1,186 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Silver 4416+ has 52800% better value for money than Xeon L5335.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon L5335 and Xeon Silver 4416+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per die) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 37.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 2x 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 60 °C | 82 °C |
| Number of transistors | 582 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L5335 and Xeon Silver 4416+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | PLGA771 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5335 and Xeon Silver 4416+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon L5335 and Xeon Silver 4416+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5335 and Xeon Silver 4416+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5335 and Xeon Silver 4416+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard | DDR5-4000 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5335 and Xeon Silver 4416+.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.99 | 25.12 |
| Recency | 13 August 2007 | 10 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 20 |
| Threads | 4 | 40 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 165 Watt |
Xeon L5335 has 230% lower power consumption.
Xeon Silver 4416+, on the other hand, has a 2437.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon L5335 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
