Pentium G2020 vs Xeon L5335
Aggregate performance score
Xeon L5335 outperforms Pentium G2020 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2738 | 2745 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.84 | 0.74 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Clovertown (2006−2007) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 13 August 2007 (18 years ago) | 21 January 2013 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $380 | $60 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon L5335 and Pentium G2020 have a nearly equal value for money.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon L5335 and Pentium G2020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per die) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 3072 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 2x 143 mm2 | 94 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 60 °C | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 582 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L5335 and Pentium G2020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | PLGA771 | FCLGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5335 and Pentium G2020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| My WiFi | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon L5335 and Pentium G2020 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5335 and Pentium G2020 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5335 and Pentium G2020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.05 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon L5335 and Pentium G2020 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5335 and Pentium G2020.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.99 | 0.97 |
| Recency | 13 August 2007 | 21 January 2013 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
Xeon L5335 has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 10% lower power consumption.
Pentium G2020, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 195% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon L5335 and Intel Pentium G2020.
Be aware that Xeon L5335 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium G2020 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
