i7-12700F vs Xeon L5335

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5335
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 50 Watt
1.09
Core i7-12700F
2022
12 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
19.32
+1672%

Core i7-12700F outperforms Xeon L5335 by a whopping 1672% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5335 and Core i7-12700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2415303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1138.45
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.0628.11
Architecture codenameClovertown (2006−2007)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date13 August 2007 (17 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$380$386

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-12700F has 34855% better value for money than Xeon L5335.

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5335 and Core i7-12700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data4
Threads420
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (per die)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cache25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size2x 143 mm2215 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5335 and Core i7-12700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketPLGA771FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5335 and Core i7-12700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon L5335 and Core i7-12700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5335 and Core i7-12700F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5335 and Core i7-12700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5335 and Core i7-12700F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5335 1.09
i7-12700F 19.32
+1672%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5335 1737
i7-12700F 30685
+1667%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 19.32
Recency 13 August 2007 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 20
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon L5335 has 30% lower power consumption.

i7-12700F, on the other hand, has a 1672.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and 200% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

The Core i7-12700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5335 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5335 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-12700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5335 and Core i7-12700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5335
Xeon L5335
Intel Core i7-12700F
Core i7-12700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Xeon L5335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1441 vote

Rate Core i7-12700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5335 or Core i7-12700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.