Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs Xeon L5335
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2738 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.84 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Clovertown (2006−2007) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| Release date | 13 August 2007 (18 years ago) | November 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $380 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Xeon L5335 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 1333 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per die) | 12 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 2x 143 mm2 | 2x 107 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 60 °C | 64 °C |
| Number of transistors | 582 million | 820 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.25V | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L5335 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | PLGA771 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5335 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| FSB parity | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon L5335 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5335 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5335 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 130 Watt |
Xeon L5335 has 160% lower power consumption.
Core 2 Extreme QX9650, on the other hand, has a 44% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon L5335 and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon L5335 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
