Apple M2 Max vs Xeon L5335
Aggregate performance score
M2 Max outperforms Xeon L5335 by a whopping 1436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2694 | 521 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 2.12 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Apple |
| Architecture codename | Clovertown (2006−2007) | no data |
| Release date | 13 August 2007 (18 years ago) | 17 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $380 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon L5335 and M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 3.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (per die) | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 2x 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 60 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 582 million | 67000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L5335 and M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | PLGA771 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 36 MB + 48 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5335 and M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon L5335 and M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5335 and M2 Max are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5335 and M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.99 | 15.21 |
| Recency | 13 August 2007 | 17 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 36 Watt |
Apple M2 Max has a 1436.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.
The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon L5335 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon L5335 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
