Core i5-750 vs Xeon L3426

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L3426
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.64

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L3426 and Core i5-750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19901987
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.410.33
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataCore i5 (Desktop)
Architecture codenameno dataLynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date1 July 2009 (14 years ago)23 September 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$150
Current price$129 $72 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon L3426 has 24% better value for money than i5-750.

Detailed specifications

Xeon L3426 and Core i5-750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus supportno data2500 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache8 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data296 mm2
Maximum core temperature58 °C73 °C
Number of transistorsno data774 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L3426 and Core i5-750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L3426 and Core i5-750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI--
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring--
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon L3426 and Core i5-750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L3426 and Core i5-750 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L3426 and Core i5-750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L3426 and Core i5-750.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L3426 1.64
i5-750 1.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon L3426 2529
i5-750 2536
+0.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon L3426 429
+0.2%
i5-750 428

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon L3426 1446
+21.2%
i5-750 1193

Xeon L3426 outperforms Core i5-750 by 21% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2009 23 September 2009
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 95 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon L3426 and Core i5-750.

Be aware that Xeon L3426 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L3426 and Core i5-750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L3426
Xeon L3426
Intel Core i5-750
Core i5-750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon L3426 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 931 vote

Rate Core i5-750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L3426 or Core i5-750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.