i7-13700TE vs Xeon L3406

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L3406
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 30 Watt
0.63
Core i7-13700TE
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 35 Watt
12.49
+1883%

Core i7-13700TE outperforms Xeon L3406 by a whopping 1883% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3007681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.2538.26
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2010 (15 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon L3406 and Core i7-13700TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB Intel® Smart Cache30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature54 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L3406 and Core i7-13700TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA11561700
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L3406 and Core i7-13700TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon L3406 and Core i7-13700TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L3406 and Core i7-13700TE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L3406 and Core i7-13700TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L3406 and Core i7-13700TE.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1624

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon L3406 0.63
i7-13700TE 12.49
+1883%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon L3406 1104
Samples: 2
i7-13700TE 22026
+1895%
Samples: 23

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 12.49
Recency 1 January 2010 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon L3406 has 16.7% lower power consumption.

i7-13700TE, on the other hand, has a 1882.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 700% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core i7-13700TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon L3406 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L3406 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-13700TE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L3406
Xeon L3406
Intel Core i7-13700TE
Core i7-13700TE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Xeon L3406 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate Core i7-13700TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon L3406 and Core i7-13700TE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.