Xeon Gold 6530 vs Gold 6558Q
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 6558Q and Xeon Gold 6530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 56 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Architecture codename | no data | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
Release date | 1 October 2023 (less than a year ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 6558Q and Xeon Gold 6530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
Threads | 64 | 64 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 4 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 60 MB | 160 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | no data | 2x 763 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 66 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 6558Q and Xeon Gold 6530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
Socket | FCLGA4677 | FCLGA4677 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 270 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6558Q and Xeon Gold 6530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
TSX | + | + |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 6558Q and Xeon Gold 6530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | Yes with Intel® SPS |
OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6558Q and Xeon Gold 6530 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6558Q and Xeon Gold 6530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5-5200 | DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC) |
Maximum memory size | 4 TB | 4 TB |
Max memory channels | 8 | 8 |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6558Q and Xeon Gold 6530.
PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 80 | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 October 2023 | 14 December 2023 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 270 Watt |
Xeon Gold 6530 has an age advantage of 2 months, and 29.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 6558Q and Xeon Gold 6530. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6558Q and Xeon Gold 6530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.