EPYC 9275F vs Xeon Gold 6530
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9275F outperforms Xeon Gold 6530 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 6530 and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 64 | 26 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 56.45 | 13.07 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 14.44 | 16.21 |
| Architecture codename | Emerald Rapids (2023) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,128 | $3,439 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Gold 6530 has 332% better value for money than EPYC 9275F.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 6530 and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 160 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 2x 763 mm2 | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 66,520 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 6530 and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 320 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6530 and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 6530 and EPYC 9275F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6530 and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6530 and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC) | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6530 and EPYC 9275F.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 80 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 40.92 | 54.43 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 24 |
| Threads | 64 | 48 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 320 Watt |
Xeon Gold 6530 has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 18.5% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has a 33% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.
The EPYC 9275F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6530 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6530 and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
