Ultra 9 285K vs Xeon Gold 6448Y

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6448Y
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
38.20
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.18
+13%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Xeon Gold 6448Y by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6448Y and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7953
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.8970.31
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency16.0032.55
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,583$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 9 285K has 161% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6448Y.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6448Y and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads6424
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
L1 cache80K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache60 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6448Y and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA46771851
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6448Y and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6448Y and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6448Y and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6448Y and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR5-4400DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6448Y and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version55.0
PCI Express lanes8020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6448Y 38.20
Ultra 9 285K 43.18
+13%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6448Y 60449
Ultra 9 285K 68341
+13.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.20 43.18
Recency 10 January 2023 24 October 2024
Physical cores 32 24
Threads 64 24
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Gold 6448Y has 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 13% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 80% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6448Y in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6448Y is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6448Y and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y
Xeon Gold 6448Y
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6448Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 98 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6448Y or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.