EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon Gold 6430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6430
2023, $2,138
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
30.32
+533%
EPYC 8324PN
2023, $2,125
32 cores / 64 threads, 130 Watt
4.79

Xeon Gold 6430 outperforms EPYC 8324PN by a whopping 533% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1871458
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.101.55
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.741.55
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date10 January 2023 (3 years ago)18 September 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,138$2,125

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6430 has 874% better value for money than EPYC 8324PN.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6430 and EPYC 8324PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.05 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache60 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm5 nm
Die size4x 477 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C85 °C
Number of transistorsno data35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6430 and EPYC 8324PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4677SP6
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6430 and EPYC 8324PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6430 and EPYC 8324PN technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6430 and EPYC 8324PN are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6430 and EPYC 8324PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4400DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6430 and EPYC 8324PN.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes8096

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 6430 30.32
+533%
EPYC 8324PN 4.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6430 53066
+534%
Samples: 3
EPYC 8324PN 8375
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.32 4.79
Recency 10 January 2023 18 September 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon Gold 6430 has a 533% higher aggregate performance score.

EPYC 8324PN, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 108% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6430 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 8324PN in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8324PN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 6430 and EPYC 8324PN, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.