Xeon Gold 5418N vs Gold 6354
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 6354 and Xeon Gold 5418N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 186 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 12.04 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,664 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 6354 and Xeon Gold 5418N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 18 (Octadeca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 36 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 39 MB (shared) | 45 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 77 °C | 84 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 6354 and Xeon Gold 5418N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA4189 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6354 and Xeon Gold 5418N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 6354 and Xeon Gold 5418N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6354 and Xeon Gold 5418N are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6354 and Xeon Gold 5418N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4000 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 TB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6354 and Xeon Gold 5418N.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5 |
| PCI Express lanes | 64 | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 April 2021 | 10 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 18 | 24 |
| Threads | 36 | 48 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 165 Watt |
Xeon Gold 5418N has an age advantage of 1 year, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 24.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 6354 and Xeon Gold 5418N. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6354 and Xeon Gold 5418N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
