i3-1115G4E vs Xeon Gold 6348

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6348
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 235 Watt
29.62
+891%
Core i3-1115G4E
2020, $285
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.99

Xeon Gold 6348 outperforms Core i3-1115G4E by a whopping 891% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1961892
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.73
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency5.328.41
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
Release date6 April 2021 (4 years ago)2 September 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$285

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6348 and Core i3-1115G4E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads564
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache42 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data144 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6348 and Core i3-1115G4E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189Intel BGA 1449
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6348 and Core i3-1115G4E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6348 and Core i3-1115G4E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6348 and Core i3-1115G4E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6348 and Core i3-1115G4E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4, LPDDR4X
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataUHD Graphics G4 48EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6348 and Core i3-1115G4E.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes644

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 6348 29.62
+891%
i3-1115G4E 2.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6348 51843
+886%
Samples: 3
i3-1115G4E 5258
Samples: 17

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Gold 6348 1490
i3-1115G4E 1688
+13.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Gold 6348 14816
+394%
i3-1115G4E 3000

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.62 2.99
Recency 6 April 2021 2 September 2020
Physical cores 28 2
Threads 56 4
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon Gold 6348 has a 891% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and 1300% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.

i3-1115G4E, on the other hand, has 1467% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6348 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i3-1115G4E in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6348 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-1115G4E is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 19 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6348 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core i3-1115G4E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 6348 and Core i3-1115G4E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.