Athlon X4 760K vs Xeon Gold 6348

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6348
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 235 Watt
29.59
+1641%

Xeon Gold 6348 outperforms Athlon X4 760K by a whopping 1641% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1902291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.320.72
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date6 April 2021 (4 years ago)1 June 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6348 and Athlon X4 760K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads564
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)192K
L2 cache1 MB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache42 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °C74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6348 and Athlon X4 760K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FM2
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6348 and Athlon X4 760K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerNow-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6348 and Athlon X4 760K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6348 and Athlon X4 760K are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6348 and Athlon X4 760K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6348 and Athlon X4 760K.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 6348 29.59
+1641%
Athlon X4 760K 1.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6348 51843
+1641%
Samples: 3
Athlon X4 760K 2977
Samples: 354

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Gold 6348 1490
+225%
Athlon X4 760K 458

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Gold 6348 14816
+1226%
Athlon X4 760K 1117

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.59 1.70
Recency 6 April 2021 1 June 2013
Physical cores 28 4
Threads 56 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 100 Watt

Xeon Gold 6348 has a 1640.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon X4 760K, on the other hand, has 135% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6348 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon X4 760K in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6348 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon X4 760K is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6348
Xeon Gold 6348
AMD Athlon X4 760K
Athlon X4 760K

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 19 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6348 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 307 votes

Rate Athlon X4 760K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 6348 and Athlon X4 760K, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.