Ultra 7 265F vs Xeon Gold 6336Y

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6336Y
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
28.37
Core Ultra 7 265F
2025
20 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
31.59
+11.4%

Core Ultra 7 265F outperforms Xeon Gold 6336Y by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking175140
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data79.26
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency14.6646.46
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)7 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6336Y and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data12
Threads4820
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6336Y and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6336Y and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6336Y and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6336Y and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6336Y and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size6 TB256 GB
Max memory channels82
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6336Y and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 6336Y 28.37
Ultra 7 265F 31.59
+11.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6336Y 45517
Ultra 7 265F 50680
+11.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.37 31.59
Recency 6 April 2021 7 January 2025
Physical cores 24 20
Threads 48 20
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Gold 6336Y has 20% more physical cores and 140% more threads.

Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has a 11.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 184.6% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6336Y is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y
Xeon Gold 6336Y
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 9 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6336Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 6336Y and Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.