Ryzen 9 5900HX vs Xeon Gold 6262V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6262V
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 135 Watt
1.80
Ryzen 9 5900HX
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
12.69
+605%

Ryzen 9 5900HX outperforms Xeon Gold 6262V by a whopping 605% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2154644
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency0.5611.89
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date2 April 2019 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6262V and Ryzen 9 5900HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier1933
L1 cache1.5 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache33 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature91 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6262V and Ryzen 9 5900HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FP6
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6262V and Ryzen 9 5900HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6262V and Ryzen 9 5900HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6262V and Ryzen 9 5900HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6262V and Ryzen 9 5900HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6262V and Ryzen 9 5900HX.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 6262V 1.80
Ryzen 9 5900HX 12.69
+605%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6262V 3155
Ryzen 9 5900HX 22252
+605%
Samples: 3393

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 12.69
Recency 2 April 2019 12 January 2021
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon Gold 6262V has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen 9 5900HX, on the other hand, has a 605% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Gold 6262V in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6262V is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 5900HX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6262V
Xeon Gold 6262V
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
Ryzen 9 5900HX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6262V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1089 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 6262V and Ryzen 9 5900HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.