i5-13400F vs Xeon Gold 6250

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6250
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 185 Watt
13.67
Core i5-13400F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.45
+20.3%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon Gold 6250 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6250 and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking564418
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.77
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency6.7423.08
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$196

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6250 and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6250 and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6250 and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6250 and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6250 and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6250 and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5, DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6250 and Core i5-13400F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6250 13.67
i5-13400F 16.45
+20.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6250 20915
i5-13400F 25179
+20.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.67 16.45
Recency 1 January 2020 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 10
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 65 Watt

i5-13400F has a 20.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 25% more physical cores, and 184.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6250 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6250 and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6250
Xeon Gold 6250
Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3093 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6250 or Core i5-13400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.